PENENTUAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PENGHAKIMAN KES FASAKH: APLIKASI MENGIKUT UNDANG-UNDANG ISLAM
Determination of the Burden of Proof in Fasakh Judgments: Application According to Islamic Law
Keywords:
burden of proof, fasakh grounds, Shariah Court, Islamic evidence lawAbstract
This article examines the concept and application of the burden of proof in fasakh cases based on Islamic fiqh and Shariah law in Malaysia. This study employs a qualitative approach by analyzing classical fiqh texts, legal provisions, and Shariah court judgments to assess how the burden of proof is applied in fasakh cases. Findings indicate that the burden of proof does not always rest with the plaintiff; in certain circumstances, the defendant bears this burden when asserting facts that contradict the original state (al-aṣl), apparent facts (al-ẓāhir), or customary practices (al-‘ādah). However, inconsistencies between fiqh principles and Shariah court practices have led to judicial discrepancies, procedural delays, and an unjust burden of proof placed on claimants, particularly in fasakh cases based on financial maintenance claims or allegations of domestic abuse. This study highlights the importance of clearer understanding among Shariah judges and lawyers, as well as the need for standardized guidelines to align judicial practices with Islamic legal principles and enhance fairness in fasakh proceedings. Additionally, this study recommends that Shariah judges and lawyers undergo regular training on the application of the burden of proof and procedural standardization to ensure more effective justice in fasakh cases.
Downloads
References
‘Abd al-Karīm Zaydān. (1989). Nizam Al-Qada’ Fi Al-Shari’at Al-Islamiyah. ‘Ammān: Mahktabah al-Bashair.
Abdulrahman Zain Ahmed Al-Attasi & Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman. (2021). “The Relationship Between Concept of Dawabit Fiqhiyyah and Dawabit Usuliyyah: A Descriptive Study,” Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 24, no. 1. October Issue, 67-77.
Ahmad Haji Bakar. (1976). “Perbandingan Antara Undang-Undang Malaysia Dan Islam Mengenai Keterangan dan Acara,” Tesis Sarjana Fakuli Undang-Undang, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
al-‘Asqalānī, Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad Ibn ‘Alī Ibn Ḥajar. (1963). Talkhis al-Habir fi Ahadith al-Rafi‘i al-Kabir, vol. 4 Qāhirah: Syirkah al-Tiba’ah al-Fanniyyah al-Muttahidah.
al-Ṣan‘āni, Muhammad Ibn Ismail. (1996). Subul al-Salam Sharh Bulugh al-Maram, vol. 4. Bayrūt: Dar al-Ma`rifah.
Al-Sharbīnī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad Ibn Muḥammad al-Khāṭib. (2006). “Mughnī al-Muḥtāj Ilā Ma`rifah Ma`ānī Alfāẓ al-Minhāj, vol. 5-6. Qāhirah: Dār al-Ḥadīth.
al-Shawkānī, Muḥammad Ibn ‘Alī Ibn Muḥammad. (1993). Nayl al-Awṭār fī Sharḥ Muntaqā al-Akhbār. Qāhirah: Dār al-Ḥadīth.
Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Ibn Abū Bakr. (1983). al-Ashbah wa al-Naẓā’ir. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Bahi Ahmad. (2019). “Penentuan Kifayah adna sebagai Jaminan Nafkah Isteri di dalam Islam: Kajian kes di Lembah Klang, Malaysia,” UMRAN: International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, 111-126.
Daud Muhammad. (2015). Falsafah Pentadbiran Keadilan Jenayah Syariah: Satu penghayatan Semula, Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang, vol. 27, no. 1.
Hamidah Harun, Wan Mohd Yusof Wan Chik & Siti Khatijah Ismail. (2021). “Analisis Elemen Kemudaratan Kecacatan Seksual Dalam Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Terengganu) 2017,” Perdana: International Journal of Academic Research (Social Sciences & Humanities), vol. 12, no. 1, 12-23.
Imad Ali Jum’ah (2006). al-Qawaidh al-Fiqhiyyah al-Maisarah. Riyad: Fahrasah Maktabah Malik Fahd al-Wataniah Ithna’ Nashr.
L.B. Curzon. (2010). Dictionary of Law. Petaling Jaya: International Law Book Service.
Mohd Badrol Awang. (2022). “Kepentingan Memahami Fakta Kes dalam Prosiding Kehakiman: Analisis dari Perspektif Kehakiman Islam,” Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, vol. 34, no. 2.
Mohd Fauzi Hamat & Mohd Sobri Ellias. (2010). “Aspek-Aspek Pemikiran Kritis Dalam Al-Qawa‘Id Al-Fiqhiyyah,” Jurnal Syariah, Jil. 18, Bil. 3, hlm. 527-564.
Mohd Zaidi Bin MD Zain. @ Zakaria. (2019). “Pemakaian Undang-Undang Tatacara Mal Dalam Prosiding Tuntutan Fasakh Di Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia,” Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Akademik Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Mohd Zaidi Md Zain@Zakaria, Raihanah Hj. Abdullah. (2019). “kelewatan pengendalian kes fasakh dalam aspek undang-undang tatacara mal: kajian kes di selangor,” Jurnal Syariah, Jil. 27, Bil. 3 (2019) 459-486.
Mohd. Saleh Haji Ahmad. (2002). “Usul Fiqh Qawa’id Fiqhiyyah,” Cetakan 3. Selangor: Pustaka Haji Abdul Majid Sdn.Bhd. hlm. 592.
Mohd. Salleh Ismail. (2003). “Pembubaran Perkahwinan Mengikut Fiqh dan Undang-undang Keluarga Islam,” Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka, h. 30.
Mushaddad Hasbullah, Zahari Mahad Musa & Mohamad Zaharuddin Zakaria. (2018). “Konsep ‘Uruf Menurut Pandangan Syarak: Sorotan Ringkas Dalam Fiqh Muamalat,” dalam Isu-Isu Semasa dalam Islam dan Sains, ed. Zahari Mahad & Dina Imam, , Kuala Nerus: Penerbit Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, hlm. 281.
Nadya Rahma Isnaini. (2021). “Istishab : Sebuah Sumber Hukum Islam dan Penerapan dalam Aktivitas riil Ekonomi,” Al-Ittifaq: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, Batusangkar: Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Vol 1, No 2, h. 71.
Raihanah Abdullah, (2009). Penangguhan Kes Di Mahkamah Syariah: Cabaran Dan Penyelesaian. Jurnal Syariah, Jil. 17, Bil 1, h.15.
Raihanah Abdullah. (1997). “Alasan Membubarkan Perkahwinan Melalui Fasakh,” Jurnal Syariah, 5/1, 1-16.
Raihanah binti Abdullah, Mahamatayuding samah & Mohd Norhusairi Mat Hussin. (2017). “Kecacatan sebagai alasan membubarkan perkahwinan melalui fasakh menurut Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia,” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Islam, Development and Social Harmony in Southeast Asia, Narathiwat, Thailand, 11-12 April 2017.
Ruzaman Md. Noor & Mohd Istajib Mokhtar. (2011). “Ulasan Kes Dari Aspek Pembuktian: Rosmah Binti Suly & Seorang Yang Lain lwn Ismail Bin Mohamad & Seorang Yang Lain,” Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, vol 26 No.1, hlm. 130-146.
Ruzman Md. Noor. (2007). “Pembuktian Dalam Kes Harta Sepencarian Di Mahkamah Syariah Di Malaysia,” Jurnal Syariah, 15/1, hlm. 29-41.
Senthilkumaran Sabapathy & Etsuko Lim. (2022). “The Shifting of the Evidential Burden in Criminal Trials,” Singapore Academy of Law Journal, SAL Prac. 18, hlm.2.
Setiyawan Gunardi, Muallim Muchammad Sahid, Amir Husin Mohd Nor, Azman Ab. Rahman, Muneer Ali Abdul Rab, Mahmoud Mohamed Ali, Fithriah Wardi, Nik Rahim Nik Wajis, Mohamad Ikwan Hami. (2017). “Konsep Al-‘Adah Muhakkamah Dalam Pewarisan Tanah Adat Menurut Adat Perpatih Di Malaysia,” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 5(2), 161-177.
Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ahmad Azam Mohd Shariff, Muhamad Helmi Md Said, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam & Tg. Noor Azira Tg. Zainudin. (2020). “Pemakaian Beban dan Darjah Pembuktian dalam Kes Jenayah Syariah di Malaysia: Suatu Analisis,” Akademika, 90(1), 87-98.
Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ruzian Markom and Mohd. Munzil Muhamad. (2019). “Kaedah pembuktian dalam undang-undang keterangan mahkamah syariah dan mahkamah sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan,” Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 31(1), 1-34.
Suhaizad Saifuddin. (2021). “Peruntukan beban Pembuktian di Bawah Enakmen Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah: Satu Penilaian,” Jurnal Undang-Undang Masyarakat, 28(2), 78- 89.
Tengku Fatimah Muliana Tengku Muda, Azizah Mohd & Noraini Md.Hashim. (2021). “Hak Isteri Terhadap Fasakh Menghilangkan Kemudaratan dalam Perkahwinan,” dalam Fiqah Kekeluargaan Islam Isu Terpilih, ed Normadiah Daud, Syh Noorul Madihah Syed Husin & Tengku Fatimah Muliana Tengku Muda, Kuala Nerus: Penerbit Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, hlm. 42-45.
Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī. (1985). al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuh. Damsyik: Dar al-Fikr..
Wan Abdul Fattah, Hasnizam Hashim, Zulfaqar Mamat, Lukman Abdul Mutalib, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, & Norma Jusof. (2021). Sumpah Nafy Al-’Ilmi Menurut Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam di Malaysia. al-Maqāsid, 2(2)
Zarina Abdullah. (2023). “Kos fail perceraian tinggi,” Suara Sarawak, 11 November 2023.
Zulfaqar Mamat. (2020). “Aplikasi Kaedah Fiqh “La Darar Wa La Dirar” Dalam Isu Covid-19 Di Malaysia,” INSLA e-Proceedings, vol. 3, no.1, hlm. 331 – 339.
Zulzaidi Mahmod & Ahmad Hidayat Buang. (2022). “Profesionalisme Hakim Syarie di Mahkamah Syariah Melalui Pemakaian Arahan Amalan Penulisan Teks Alasan Penghakiman,” Jurnal Pengurusan dan Penyelidikan Fatwa, Vol. 27, No. 4, hlm. 116.
Senarai Statut
Akta Keterangan 1950 (Akta 56)
Ordinan Keterangan Syariah, 2001[Bab 47]
Ordinan Undang-Undang keluarga Islam, 2001 [Bab 43]
Senarai Kes
AAM lwn. MAB, Kes Mal MRSS, Kes 10005-014-229-2004 (tidak dilaporkan)
CAS v MPPL & Anor [2022] 12 MLJ 135)
Fatimah Binti Ahmad lwn. Abdul Latif bin Muslim [2019] Edisi 1/2019 JMS 124
Fatimah binti Osman lwn. Norazmi bin Tukiban [2001] jld. 14 bhg.1 JH 65
Hairun bt Sharif lwn Omar bin Mohd Noor [1993] jld. 8 bhg. 2 JH 289
Joan Mary Sulaiman lwn Sulaiman bin Haji Musa [1995] jld. 10, bhg. 1 JH 86
Nur Ala Amalina binti Ismail lwn. Mohamad Abid bin Mohamad [2020] Edisi 1/2020 JMS 104
Rokiah Mudzi lwn. Mohd Yunus Keling [2018] 3 LNS 1
Zalina binti Awi lwn. Amiruddin Bin Yusof [2020] Edisi 2020 JMS 115
Zulrina binti Zahari lwn. Mohd Shu’aib bin Hj. Ishak [2014] jld.38, bhg.1 JH 90
Temu bual
Mohd Sufi Bin Mohd Rani (Peguam Syarie di Jabatan Bantuan Guaman, Sarawak), dalam temu bual bersama penulis pada 23 September 2024.
